I’d say also it is information dense in the wrong things.
It’s quite hard to find a product that is “bad” in it’s honeymoon period. Unlike “used for 1 week+” phone reviews for example, you only get a small part of the story.
What’s it like to use the phone for more than the day or two it took to shoot the video?
And I get it’s hard to make earbuds/ headphone reviews but watching somebody listen to their music with non-copyright stuff overlayed… What am I meant to gain?
That being said short-circuit definitely has a good niche. The toaster video was definitely something that fits the format/ concept well.
Don’t remember how it was when it started, but it’s mostly marketed like a simple “hands on” channel and while the reality is it’s now a review channel.
Not a problem in itself, sometimes the editorial focus change, it’s normal for a media to evolve. But you need to acknowledge it … Otherwise you get into uncomfortable situations.
They literally said themselves that they hash the verification email address. and of course you can hash a recovery email address.
If the user wants to use the recovery email option, you let them input what recovery email they used, hash it and if it matches the stored hash you send the recovery email to the entered email address.
If the user requests a recovery code, you let them input the email address and you compare that hash with the stored hash. If they match you send the recovery code to the email the user input.
Exposing your princes like that is one of the worst thing you can do. It gives a point of reference to your client on how much they can lower the price in a negotiation as they know you’ve already agreed to that before.